Warning Photographers
Harrased
On the third day of shooting
the contract security individuals harassed me because I had a
tripod. There was nothing like this when I shot with a monopod
on the second day of shooting. When I took pictures in monopod
mode, on the third day, one individual said this was ok and other
seemed not able to count – he claimed the pictures were
being taken as a tripod.
When I was in the museum on the first day members of the press
had complex equipment, including large video tripods and no one
was being hassled.
One contract security individual
stated that the reason they do not like tripods is individual
access is
restricted due to the
three legs being place on the floor. Yet, I was extremely careful
in the placement of the legs and used monopod mode much of the
time. Further, having a tripod laid down for a shot is less of
a hazard to those walking the museum pathways that an individual
with a cane – the cane moves while the tripod legs do not.
This
is all a great disappointment and a sad mark for the National Air
and Space Museum. The “rent-a-security” mentality
is that professional photographers are a hassle and they are interfering
with others seeing the museum – unless one has a press pass.
Yet, it totally ignores the value of web sites such as this for
those that cannot get to the museum. More importantly there is
no common sense about the equipment being used. If the objective
is to not impede access this can be handled with care by the photographer.
But the individuals who implement security on the floor hardly
know anything about equipment and the overall value to the museum
when professionals are successful.
This is but another warning that
one should be prepared for further erosion of photographer’s
rights.
|